
Ihr Browser versucht gerade eine Seite aus dem sogenannten Internet auszudrucken. Das Internet ist ein weltweites Netzwerk von Computern, das den Menschen ganz neue Möglichkeiten der Kommunikation bietet.
Da Politiker im Regelfall von neuen Dingen nichts verstehen, halten wir es für notwendig, sie davor zu schützen. Dies ist im beidseitigen Interesse, da unnötige Angstzustände bei Ihnen verhindert werden, ebenso wie es uns vor profilierungs- und machtsüchtigen Politikern schützt.
Sollten Sie der Meinung sein, dass Sie diese Internetseite dennoch sehen sollten, so können Sie jederzeit durch normalen Gebrauch eines Internetbrowsers darauf zugreifen. Dazu sind aber minimale Computerkenntnisse erforderlich. Sollten Sie diese nicht haben, vergessen Sie einfach dieses Internet und lassen uns in Ruhe.
Die Umgehung dieser Ausdrucksperre ist nach §95a UrhG verboten.
Mehr Informationen unter www.politiker-stopp.de.
| Menu verstecken/anzeigen |
|
Menü |
[JB] Computer / Linux & Norton ![]() |
|---|---|
|
|
Why do Norton Utilities and other Symantec software not exist for Linux?A couple years ago Symantec evaluated porting their products, or some of them, to Linux. They obviously came to the same conclusion as the Linux community: Norton is irrelevant for Linux. This is a news article posting that explains the reasons, but also mentions some reasons why a port would perhaps make sense. But nevertheless, I think Norton is never going to do it, especially because when they tried developing a similar suite for OS/2, Microsoft tightened their thumb screws in that they weren't allowed any "insider information" about Windows any more (and how can you develop rescue software for a system you aren't allowed to know the internals of?). Headline: Symantec is irrelevant for LinuxSymantec & Lotus: They already sold out, or have been crushed by Microsoft. Much more worrisome. Of course Symantec wouldn't port their products to Linux. Most of Symantec's products would be completely unnecessary under Linux. Symantec's products page presently lists 17 software products, of which three serve solely to fix Windows or MacOS design flaws, eight serve purposes already well-served by existing free software, and two serve political purposes not in tune with many or most users of Linux-based OSes. I count only three as potential Linux-based products. The following Symantec products serve to correct or work around design flaws of Windows/DOS or MacOS:
The following Symantec products serve purposes already filled by existing free software:
The following Symantec products serve political purposes not in tune with many or most Linux users; specifically, they are parental or office censorware:
(The functionality of censorware may be duplicated with free software, so these could perhaps be put in the previous category; however, due to the general opinion of censorware as Bad And Wrong [i.e. unethical on principle and furthermore broken in its implementations] among the Linux community, they belong in their own category.) The following Symantec products are potentially useful under a Linux-based OS:
(Mobile WinFax is not counted as it runs on the PalmOS, not a conventional OS. Norton SystemWorks is not counted because it is a bundle of several packages listed above.) In short, it is not to be taken as a surprise that Symantec, and other
"utility software" companies, see themselves as not having anything to
offer the Linux community -- they don't.
Zuletzt geändert am: 15.06.2003 10:11
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|